They were soon joined by other immigrants who came direct fromĮngland. Many of the petitioners settled there where The Court passed an order granting this petition.* The plantation Tation to the westward, and on the 6th of September in that year There, petitioned the General Court for liberty to form a new plan. Accordingly, inġ63S, Brian Pendleton and a number of the other leading citizens Not be large enough to support all the inhabitants. Had increased to such an extent that it was feared the township would While these events were in progress the population of Watertown No place in the scheme of a religious despotism. Similar, Pendleton showed himself not without mercy, and mercy has Indeed, we shall find that some years later, on an occasion not dis. Him as being sufficiently illiberal in his news to work their will. Ting rid of the dissenters, it would appear that they did not regard To have been selected by the ministry for the express purpose of get. Pendleton was not a member of theĬourt which engaged in this religious persecution in November, 163 ?,Īnd as the Deputies therein from the towns outside of Boston seem Whose teachings were regarded as heretical and liable to disrupt theĬhurch, suffered the same fate. Played the ancient hatred of orthodoxy toward freedom of thought.Īn alien law was passed, Roger Williams was banished in 1635, and Ives, Huntingdonshire (Water's " Genealogical Gleanings in * The will of Job Tookie, the Elder of Mortlake, Surrey, England, mentions Trenched the Puritan theocracy in power and at the same time dis. These years were marked by various procedures which en. 1638.§ The Court of Assist-Īnts also appointed him a member of the Grand Jury in September.ġ637. Of March, 1635/6, and re-elected as such on the 18th of April, 1637,Ħth of March, 1637/8, and 2nd May. With Some Accounl «>t the Pembleton Families Y., and Luzerne County, Pa., and notices of other Pendletons of later origin in the United States" However, despite the possibilities afforded by the forum, which are utilized by posters for performing Irish in different ways, these everyday practices are effectively erased and invalidated by the prevailing discourses, which rely strongly on the notion of bilingualism as parallel and discrete monolingualisms.Full text of " Brian Pendleton and his descendants, 1599-1910, with some account of the Pembleton families of Orange County, N. The features of the forum and the online, real-time evolution of the discussion thread impact in a number of ways upon these discourses and ideologies. In the discussion thread, three particular discourses emerge: a "discourse of truth" about Irish as lacking both authority as a national language and authenticity as a minority language of a recognizable ethnic group a discourse of "them and us" involving a differentiation between "Irish speakers" and "non-Irish speakers", largely based on notions of competence and, finally, a newly emerging discourse of "sexy Irish", which signals a commodification of Irish speakers as young, beautiful and mediatisable. This article explores some of that complexity by investigating a thread on an online discussion forum on the subject of the first ever party leaders' debate in Irish that took place during the 2011 general election in Ireland. Thematising Irish in the media reflects the complex and contradictory sociolinguistic and language-ideological situation in Ireland.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |